How corporate practices can shape nations
I’ve noticed that historical books written about India
during the seventeenth and the twentieth centuries fall, perforce, into
one of two categories: either they are mind-bendingly dull text books
or they are lyrical post-modern takes on how ‘cool’ the Companywallas really were. I looked at my review copy of Nick Robins' The Corporation that Changed the World, with its crowded text, its maps and graphs, and winced: dull text book, it was.
I
couldn’t have been more wrong. This is one of those rare things in non-fiction: an Unputdownable. Robins’ account
of the East India Company’s business practices in India
is a riveting blend of crisp, almost thriller-like writing with a great
amount of intelligence and passion. While we all pretty much know the
broad outlines of what happened, Robins looks at that time in Indian and British history so
closely, and with such a unique perspective, that you can’t help but be
swept along on his fascinating journey.
Robins’
aim through this book is to examine the East India Company – the world’s first multi-national corporation – in the light of its
business practices. He finds insider trading, exploitation and greed –
pretty much the basic template for multinational corporations of our
times. Though the Company operated nearly 400 years back, its methods
are uncannily familiar. There was the same hunger for monopoly, the same
irresponsibility, and shockingly, nearly the same amount of
unaccountability.
And
as Robins gently unfolds page after page of the Company’s history, you
see his point. As it gained more monopoly over Indian trade, the Company
became a policy-maker by default. Placing the fate of an entire people
in the hands of a few businessmen who were driven by ‘persistent share
holders’ led to the inevitable: famine and the destruction of a thriving
textile industry. India, as he puts it trenchantly, was basically screwed over by the Company.
Robins
slides the reader smoothly into the historical, always pegging his
narration on individuals and not mere dates. To this end, he harnesses
Victorian ‘corporate’ art, cartoons and poetry; Ghalib’s verse; local
legends and stories of real people. There are some amazing accounts of
people who history books rarely have time for. Like Rajah Nabakrishna,
the Indian merchant, and his interaction with Hastings; the Armenian
traders based in India who actually managed to take the Company to court
in 1777; and the miserable conditions of lascars, Indian sailors who made up a quarter of the Company’s sailors, and were later abandoned on the streets of London in the 1700s.
Robins
links the various forms of the Company’s cruelty to ‘geographical
morality’, a frighteningly hypocritical belief system. It condoned
everything from slavery to drug-trafficking and undemocratic practices
so long as it happened in a different region, to people of a different
religious persuasion or colour. Cornelius Walford, writing in 1877,
observed that in the 120 years of British rule in India,
there had been 34 famines, as opposed only 17 in the entire two
millennia that went before. When famine struck, traditional rulers like
the Mughals would punish hoarders and give away grain for free. This is
contrasted with the Company’s response, which was to do some of the
hoarding itself!
To
learn from history, one must first acknowledge it. So Robins feels that
the Company’s seamier practices (like that of growing opium in Bihar
instead of food and smuggling it into China
in exchange of tea) should be discussed fully. He is critical of
exhibitions which present the Company’s history as a mutually beneficial
and fascinating exchange of goods. He is also critical of fellow
historians who romanticize individual Company executives like Warren
Hastings and their cultural pursuits, while turning a blind eye to their
corporate malpractices.
The
book is a clear indictment of what can go wrong if corporations are
given the right to determine policies. There are parallels between the
Company and contemporary corporations like Union Carbide and Enron; with
the American and British presence in Iraq; with Shell’s human rights violations in Nigeria; and with Wall Mart’s malpractices in China.
The Corporation… has
honestly upped the bar for historians who want to write sound but
eminently enjoyable, relevant and accessible history books. Robins’s
success lies in the fact that in presenting history, he has created a
spanking good read as well. More importantly, there are many evocative
reminders for a world that is rapidly decreasing corporate
accountability. Not always is the profit motive good; almost never does
it seek the larger good of society.
Comments